Circularise alternative: how DPPWare differs
A fair look at both: what Circularise states about itself, when it is the better choice and where our platform takes a different approach.
Circularise
What Circularise offers
Circularise presents itself as a supply-chain traceability provider. Its software is described as a way to collect, trace and share data across many tiers of a supply chain, with the Digital Product Passport as one of several uses. The website names a wide range of industries, offers a free trial and publishes part of its pricing.
Circularise
When Circularise is the better fit
- You need traceability of materials through several tiers, including mass balance.
- You work in chemicals, plastics or metals, where its website shows a clear focus.
- You want an established provider with references and partnerships.
DPPWare
How DPPWare differs
- We start from the product record and the passport, not from material flows through the chain.
- Supplier data is requested per product and field and is reviewed before it is used.
- We are at an early stage and say for each function whether it is available, configured or planned.
Comparison
Side by side
| Comparison | Circularise | DPPWare |
|---|---|---|
| Focus | Supply-chain traceability; the product passport is one of several uses | Product data, supplier data review and passport publishing with an audience per field |
| Industries named | Automotive, construction, chemicals, metals, batteries, textiles, electronics, furniture and others | Textiles available as a prototype; seven further industries configured per project |
| Prices | Partly published | On request |
| Getting started | Free trial | Contact or demo request |
| Supplier data | Ask the provider | Request by link, review, then approval into the passport |
| Audience per field | Ask the provider | Public, legitimate interest or authorities, set per field |
| Try without sign-up | Free trial | Public demo workspace |
A note on fairness
Information about Circularise comes from its public website and was not independently verified. We have not tested the product. Names and trademarks belong to their owners. If something is wrong or out of date, tell us and we will correct it.
Related
Other comparisons
Ready to manage your product data more effectively?
Tell us about your organisation, product portfolio and DPP requirements.
Model, batch and item level
Three audiences per field
Versioned publication
Hosted in Germany